How many High Courts are there in India and which states do they serve?

As of 2024, India has 25 High Courts serving different states and union territories. Some High Courts serve single states like the Delhi High Court (Delhi), Karnataka High Court (Karnataka), and Kerala High Court (Kerala), while others serve multiple states such as the Gauhati High Court (Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Tripura, Meghalaya, and Arunachal Pradesh). The newest High Court is the Telangana High Court, established in 2019 following the state's bifurcation from Andhra Pradesh. This arrangement reflects practical considerations of geography, population, and administrative efficiency while ensuring that every state has access to High Court jurisdiction as mandated by Article 214 of the Constitution.

What is the difference between Article 32 and Article 226 writ jurisdiction?

Article 32 grants the Supreme Court writ jurisdiction primarily for enforcement of fundamental rights and is called the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution, while Article 226 grants High Courts broader writ jurisdiction for fundamental rights enforcement and 'any other purpose.' High Courts can issue writs throughout their territorial jurisdiction, making them more accessible than the Supreme Court. Article 32 is a fundamental right itself, while Article 226 is a constitutional power. High Courts under Article 226 can refuse to exercise writ jurisdiction in their discretion, whereas the Supreme Court under Article 32 cannot ordinarily refuse when fundamental rights are violated. The territorial scope differs significantly - High Courts operate within state boundaries while the Supreme Court has pan-India jurisdiction.

What are the qualifications required to become a High Court judge?

Under Article 217 of the Constitution, a person can be appointed as a High Court judge if they are a citizen of India and either: (1) have practiced as an advocate in any court in India for at least 10 years, or (2) have served as a judicial officer for at least 10 years. The practice period includes time spent as an advocate in any court, not necessarily High Courts. Judicial officers include district judges, additional district judges, and other members of the subordinate judiciary. There is no specific age requirement for appointment, but judges must retire at age 62. The appointment process involves consultation between the President, Chief Justice of India, state Governor, and the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court, following the collegium system established through Supreme Court judgments.

How does the collegium system work for High Court appointments?

The collegium system for High Court appointments involves a five-member collegium consisting of the Chief Justice of India and four senior-most Supreme Court judges. For High Court Chief Justice appointments, the collegium considers seniority, merit, and regional representation. For other High Court judges, the collegium consults with the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court and considers recommendations from various sources including the state government and High Court collegium. The process emphasizes merit, integrity, and suitability for judicial office. Once the collegium makes recommendations, they are sent to the government for appointment. The system aims to ensure judicial independence while maintaining quality and accountability in appointments, though it has faced criticism for lack of transparency and accountability mechanisms.

What is the supervisory jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 227?

Article 227 grants High Courts supervisory jurisdiction over all subordinate courts within their territorial limits, enabling them to ensure proper administration of justice and uniformity in legal interpretation. This power includes calling for records of cases from subordinate courts, transferring cases between courts, and issuing directions for efficient court administration. High Courts can examine whether subordinate courts are functioning within their jurisdiction and in accordance with established procedures. This supervisory power is administrative rather than appellate - it focuses on ensuring proper functioning rather than re-examining merits of cases. High Courts use this power to prevent miscarriage of justice, ensure procedural compliance, and maintain judicial standards across the subordinate judiciary within their jurisdiction.

Can High Courts declare laws unconstitutional?

Yes, High Courts possess the power of judicial review and can declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution. This power flows from their status as constitutional courts and their writ jurisdiction under Article 226. High Courts can examine the constitutional validity of both central and state laws within their jurisdiction. However, when a High Court declares a central law unconstitutional, the decision is binding only within that High Court's territorial jurisdiction unless upheld by the Supreme Court. For state laws, the High Court's decision has broader implications within the state. The power of judicial review is subject to the basic structure doctrine established in Kesavananda Bharati case, and High Court decisions on constitutional matters can be appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 132.

What is the original jurisdiction of High Courts?

High Courts exercise original jurisdiction in specific categories of cases as determined by their constitutional and statutory powers. This includes matrimonial cases (divorce, judicial separation), testamentary and intestate succession matters, admiralty and vice-admiralty cases in coastal states, company law matters, and cases involving substantial questions of constitutional interpretation. High Courts also have original jurisdiction in revenue matters, certain categories of civil suits exceeding specified monetary limits, and cases where the state government is a party. The original jurisdiction varies among High Courts based on their enabling legislation and local requirements. Unlike subordinate courts, High Court original jurisdiction is limited and specialized, focusing on matters requiring authoritative legal determination at the state level.

How are High Court judges transferred and why?

High Court judges can be transferred from one High Court to another by the President of India after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, as provided in Article 222. Transfers are typically made to ensure better administration of justice, utilize judicial expertise where needed, or address regional imbalances in judicial strength. The collegium system governs transfer decisions, considering factors like administrative needs, judge's experience and expertise, family circumstances, and regional requirements. Transfers help in sharing judicial experience across different High Courts and can address specific challenges like case pendency or specialized legal issues. While transfers are administrative decisions aimed at improving judicial efficiency, they must be made in consultation with appropriate authorities and cannot be used as punitive measures against judges.

High Courts

Indian Economy

Constitution VerifiedUPSC Verified

Version 1Updated 5 Mar 2026

Explore This Topic

Definition Detailed Explanation Key Judgments Economic Framework Policy Reforms UPSC Importance Prelims Strategy Mains Strategy Prelims MCQs Mains Questions MCQ Practice Predicted 2026 Revision Notes Current Affairs

Article 214: There shall be a High Court for each State. Article 215: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself. Article 216: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint. Article 217: (1) Every Judge of …

Quick Summary

High Courts are constitutional courts established under Articles 214-231, serving as the highest judicial authorities at state level in India's three-tier judicial system. Currently, 25 High Courts serve all states and union territories, with some covering multiple states for administrative efficiency.

Each High Court consists of a Chief Justice and additional judges appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, state Governor, and concerned High Court Chief Justice, following the collegium system.

High Court judges must be Indian citizens with either 10 years of legal practice or 10 years of judicial service, retiring at age 62. High Courts exercise original jurisdiction in matrimonial, testamentary, admiralty, and constitutional matters; appellate jurisdiction over subordinate court decisions; and supervisory jurisdiction over all subordinate courts under Article 227.

Their most significant power is writ jurisdiction under Article 226, enabling them to issue habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo-warranto writs for fundamental rights enforcement and other legal purposes.

This jurisdiction is broader than the Supreme Court's Article 32 powers, covering any legal purpose within their territorial limits. High Courts serve as courts of record under Article 215, meaning their proceedings are permanently recorded and decisions constitute binding precedents.

They possess inherent contempt powers to maintain judicial dignity and authority. High Courts play crucial roles in constitutional interpretation, protection of fundamental rights, and maintaining federal balance between central and state authorities.

Modern challenges include case pendency, infrastructure constraints, and technological adaptation, addressed through e-Courts initiatives, case management reforms, and digital transformation projects.

Vyyuha

Your 6-Month Blueprint, Updated Nightly

AI analyses your progress every night. Wake up to a smarter plan. Every. Single.…

25 High Courts in India under Articles 214-231

Judges appointed by President, retire at 62 years

Article 215: Court of record status

Article 226: Writ jurisdiction (broader than Article 32)

Article 227: Supervisory powers over subordinate courts

Five writs: habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, quo-warranto

Collegium system for appointments (Second Judges Case 1993)

Original, appellate, and supervisory jurisdiction

Some High Courts serve multiple states (e.g., Gauhati - 7 states)

Vyyuha Quick Recall - 'HIGH COURT POWERS': H-Habeas corpus writ, I-Independent appointment (collegium), G-Guardians of rights (Article 226), H-Hierarchical supervision (Article 227), C-Court of record (Article 215), O-Original jurisdiction (matrimonial/testamentary), U-Union territory extension possible, R-Retirement at 62 years, T-Transfer powers for judges, P-President appoints after consultation, O-Overseeing subordinate courts, W-Writ jurisdiction broader than SC, E-Each state has access (Article 214), R-Record maintenance with precedential value, S-State-level constitutional interpretation.

Memory Palace: Visualize a grand courthouse with 25 pillars (25 High Courts), a 62-year-old Chief Justice holding 5 writ scrolls (habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, quo-warranto), supervising lower courts through a telescope (Article 227), while consulting with CJI via video call (collegium system).

High Courts

Quick Summary

Related Topics