Environment & Ecology·Environmental Laws
Sources and Effects — Environmental Laws
Constitution VerifiedUPSC Verified
Version 1Updated 6 Mar 2026
| Entry | Year | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| G.S.R. 50(E) | 2002 | This amendment introduced a provision allowing the State Government to permit the use of loudspeakers or public address systems during night hours (between 10 PM and 12 midnight) on specific occasions, not exceeding fifteen days in a calendar year. This was a significant relaxation to the earlier blanket ban on night-time use. | Provided flexibility for cultural and religious events but also created potential for increased noise during late hours, requiring careful monitoring and permission granting by authorities. It highlighted the tension between cultural practices and noise control. |
| G.S.R. 715(E) | 2010 | This amendment clarified the definition of 'authority' to include the District Magistrate, Police Commissioner, or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, thereby empowering a wider range of officials to enforce the rules. It also reiterated the need for strict implementation of noise standards. | Strengthened the enforcement mechanism by clearly designating responsible authorities at the district level, aiming to improve compliance and accountability in controlling noise pollution. It addressed the previous ambiguity in enforcement responsibilities. |
| G.S.R. 637(E) | 2017 | This amendment made it mandatory for the State Governments to collect and compile data on noise pollution and submit it to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) annually. It also emphasized the role of the CPCB in preparing guidelines for noise mapping and monitoring. | Aimed to improve data collection and analysis for better policy formulation and targeted interventions. It underscored the importance of scientific monitoring and data-driven decision-making in noise pollution management, enhancing the CPCB's oversight role [VY:ENV-04-02-01]. |