Nature and Scope of Ethics — Prelims Strategy

Prelims Strategy

Use the objective questions to test distinctions before memorising labels. Ask whether a statement describes a fact, expresses a value, identifies a duty or predicts a consequence. A sentence can contain more than one element, so examine what the question specifically asks. Do not infer that a popular practice is justified merely because many people follow it.

Compare law, custom and ethics through short examples. A lawful option may still create an avoidable conflict; an ethical concern does not authorise an officer to disregard the governing law. Similarly, distinguish an undesirable outcome from evidence that a decision was dishonest. Intent, care, available information and procedure can change the assessment.

When choosing among responses to a scenario, prefer the option that addresses the actual issue with relevant reasons and feasible action. Avoid selecting the most emotionally appealing phrase without checking authority or consequences. After answering, explain why each rejected option was tempting. This page supports conceptual revision for GS IV; it does not imply a dedicated Ethics Prelims paper or predict an examination question.