Internal Security·Legal Reforms

Contemporary Dance — Legal Reforms

Updated 19 Oct 2026
EntryYearDescriptionImpact
Copyright 20122012The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 inserted section 38B through section 27. It gives performers moral rights independently of assignment: a right to identification, subject to the stated exception where the manner of use dictates omission, and a right to restrain or seek damages for distortion, mutilation or other modification prejudicial to reputation. Its explanation qualifies the latter rule for removal of portions for editing, fitting a recording within limited duration or purely technical modifications. Thus the provision does not treat every edit of a contemporary dance recording as reputational injury.Compare two hypothetical edits: shortening a filmed performance to fit a programme slot, and rearranging movements to give the dancer a degrading meaning. The first engages the express editing qualification; the second calls for examination of modification and prejudice to reputation rather than an automatic conclusion. Credit and integrity also require separate analysis from commercial permission. This gives a contemporary-dance answer a concrete rights issue while avoiding the claim that section 38B grants ownership of an entire movement vocabulary or makes all criticism unlawful.