Conflict with Fundamental Rights — Amendments

Amendment	Year	Description	Impact
1st Amendment	1951	Introduced Articles 31A and 31B and the Ninth Schedule to protect land reform and other social welfare laws from Fundamental Rights challenges, particularly the right to property and equality.	Established the precedent of using constitutional amendments to resolve FR-DPSP conflicts and created a mechanism to shield certain laws from judicial review on Fundamental Rights grounds.
25th Amendment	1971	Modified Article 31 to clarify that compensation for property acquisition need not be equivalent to market value and added Article 31C to protect laws implementing Articles 39(b) and (c) from challenges under Articles 14, 19, and 31.	Significantly weakened property rights and strengthened the state's power to implement socialist policies, marking a shift toward Directive Principles in the FR-DPSP balance.
42nd Amendment	1976	Extended Article 31C to protect laws implementing any Directive Principle from challenges under any Fundamental Right, giving Directive Principles virtual supremacy during the Emergency period.	Represented the high-water mark of Directive Principles supremacy, but was largely struck down by the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills (1980) for destroying constitutional balance.
44th Amendment	1978	Removed the right to property from Fundamental Rights (deleting Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31) and made it a constitutional right under Article 300A, significantly reducing property-related FR-DPSP conflicts.	Resolved the most contentious area of FR-DPSP conflict by allowing greater state flexibility in property acquisition while maintaining constitutional protection against arbitrary deprivation.

Also build Paper II skills

Dense constitutional and IR passages mirror CSAT-style comprehension and argument evaluation—build those skills in parallel. CSAT hub.

• Valid & invalid arguments
• Syllogisms
• Critical reasoning