Counter-terrorism Cooperation — Landmark Judgments

Landmark Judgments

Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab

1994

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), establishing important precedents for anti-terrorism…

Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra

1994

This judgment dealt with the investigation and prosecution of the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts, establishing important precedents for handling transnational terrorism cases. The…

People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India

2004

The Supreme Court struck down the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) 2002, citing concerns about misuse and violation of fundamental rights. This judgment led to the enactment of…

Also build Paper II skills

Dense constitutional and IR passages mirror CSAT-style comprehension and argument evaluation—build those skills in parallel. CSAT hub.

• Valid & invalid arguments
• Syllogisms
• Critical reasoning