Terrorism and Security — Landmark Judgments

Landmark Judgments

Kartar Singh vs State of Punjab

1994

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) 1987, establishing important precedents for anti-terrorism…

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs Union of India

2014

This landmark judgment addressed the issue of encounter killings and fake encounters by security forces. The Court laid down comprehensive guidelines for investigating encounter…

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State of Maharashtra

2015

The Supreme Court's final judgment in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts case established important precedents for death penalty in terrorism cases. The Court distinguished between…

Also build Paper II skills

Dense constitutional and IR passages mirror CSAT-style comprehension and argument evaluation—build those skills in parallel. CSAT hub.

• Valid & invalid arguments
• Syllogisms
• Critical reasoning