Social Justice & Welfare·Explained

Wildlife Protection — Explained

Updated 9 Mar 2026

Detailed Explanation

Wildlife protection in India is a dynamic and multifaceted domain, evolving from a colonial legacy of game preservation to a modern, comprehensive framework rooted in constitutional principles and international commitments.

This journey reflects a growing understanding of ecological interdependence and the intrinsic value of biodiversity. From a UPSC perspective, the critical examination angle here is to understand not just the 'what' but the 'why' and 'how' of these protective measures, and their practical implications on the ground.

1. Origin and Evolution of Wildlife Protection in India

Historically, wildlife management in India was largely driven by the hunting interests of royalty and colonial rulers, with some localized efforts for game preservation. Post-independence, the rapid decline in wildlife populations due to habitat destruction, poaching, and unregulated hunting necessitated a more structured approach.

Early efforts were fragmented, with states having their own laws. The need for a uniform national law became evident, leading to the enactment of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (WPA, 1972). This Act marked a paradigm shift, moving towards a conservation-oriented approach rather than mere regulation of hunting.

India's commitment to wildlife protection is enshrined in its Constitution. While the original Constitution did not explicitly mention environmental protection, subsequent amendments introduced crucial provisions:

  • Article 48A (Directive Principles of State Policy):Inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, it directs the State to 'endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.' This provides a foundational policy directive for environmental governance.
  • Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duties):Also inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, it imposes a duty on every citizen 'to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures.' This emphasizes collective responsibility.

Initially, 'forests' and 'protection of wild animals and birds' were in the State List. The 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, transferred these subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List, enabling both the Parliament and State Legislatures to legislate on these matters.

This facilitated the enactment and effective implementation of central laws like the WPA, 1972, ensuring a uniform approach across the nation. This constitutional backing provides the legislative competence and moral imperative for robust wildlife conservation efforts .

3. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: A Comprehensive Analysis

The WPA, 1972, is the cornerstone of wildlife conservation in India. Its primary objectives are to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds, and plants, and to establish a network of ecologically important protected areas.

Key Provisions:

  • Prohibition of Hunting:The Act prohibits the hunting of any wild animal specified in Schedules I, II, III, and IV. Hunting of animals in Schedule V (vermin) is permitted. The 2022 Amendment Act removed Schedule V entirely, effectively granting protection to all species listed in the schedules. However, the Central Government can still declare certain species as vermin for specific areas and periods.
  • Protection of Specified Plants:Chapter IIIA of the Act provides for the protection of specified plants, prohibiting their picking, uprooting, possession, sale, or transport without a license.
  • Declaration and Management of Protected Areas:The Act empowers the Central and State Governments to declare National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Conservation Reserves, and Community Reserves.
  • Regulation of Trade and Commerce:It regulates trade in wild animals, animal articles, and trophies, prohibiting commercial exploitation of endangered species.
  • Penalties:The Act prescribes stringent penalties for violations, with higher penalties for offenses related to Schedule I and Part II of Schedule II animals.

Major Amendments:

  • 1991 Amendment:Significantly strengthened the Act by increasing penalties, banning trade in Indian ivory, and including plants under its purview. It also expanded the scope of protected areas.
  • 2002 Amendment:Introduced the concept of 'Community Reserves' and 'Conservation Reserves' to involve local communities in conservation. It also established the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) and State Boards for Wildlife (SBWL) as statutory bodies.
  • 2006 Amendment:Crucially, this amendment created the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) to strengthen tiger conservation and combat wildlife crime. It also provided for the declaration of Tiger Reserves.
  • Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022:This is a significant recent development. Key changes include:

* Rationalization of Schedules: Reduced the number of schedules from six to four. Schedule I for highly protected species, Schedule II for other protected species, Schedule III for specified plants, and Schedule IV for specimens listed in CITES Appendices.

Schedule V (vermin) and Schedule VI (cultivation of specified plants) were removed. * CITES Implementation: Explicitly incorporated the provisions of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) into domestic law, empowering the Central Government to regulate the import, export, and possession of CITES-listed specimens.

* Standing Committee of State Board for Wildlife: Mandated the constitution of a Standing Committee for the State Board for Wildlife, mirroring the NBWL structure. * Conservation Reserves: Allowed for the declaration of Conservation Reserves by the Central Government, in addition to State Governments.

* Management Authority: Designated a Management Authority for CITES implementation, with powers to issue permits for trade. * Invasive Alien Species: Empowered the Central Government to regulate or prohibit the import, trade, possession, or proliferation of invasive alien species.

* Elephant Translocation: Allowed for the transfer or transport of live elephants by a person having a certificate of ownership, subject to conditions prescribed by the Central Government. This provision has been a point of contention among conservationists.

Enforcement Mechanisms:

Enforcement is primarily carried out by the Chief Wildlife Warden (CWLW) of each state/UT, assisted by various wildlife wardens and authorized officers. The WPA grants powers of search, seizure, and arrest to these officers. The Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) plays a crucial role at the national level in coordinating efforts to combat organized wildlife crime.

4. Institutional Framework

Effective wildlife protection relies on a robust institutional framework:

  • National Board for Wildlife (NBWL):A statutory body chaired by the Prime Minister. It serves as an apex advisory body to the Central and State Governments on all matters relating to wildlife conservation, including policy formulation and project approvals in protected areas. It reviews all wildlife-related projects and advises on the declaration and management of protected areas. Its Standing Committee, chaired by the Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, handles routine approvals.
  • State Wildlife Boards (SWBL):Chaired by the Chief Minister of the respective state/UT, these boards advise the state government on matters concerning wildlife protection, including the selection and management of protected areas.
  • Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB):Established under the WPA, 1972, it is a statutory body tasked with combating organized wildlife crime. Its functions include collecting and collating intelligence, establishing a centralized wildlife crime data bank, coordinating with state enforcement agencies, and assisting foreign authorities in wildlife crime investigations. It plays a vital role in curbing illegal wildlife trade, often operating as part of the TRAFFIC network.
  • Project Tiger:Launched in 1973, it is one of India's most successful conservation programs. It aims to ensure a viable population of Bengal tigers in their natural habitats, protect them from extinction, and preserve areas of biological importance as a natural heritage. It involves the creation of dedicated Tiger Reserves with core/buffer strategies and active management. The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) oversees its implementation.
  • Project Elephant:Launched in 1992, it aims to protect elephants, their habitat, and corridors, address human-elephant conflict, and ensure the welfare of captive elephants. It provides financial and technical support to major elephant-bearing states.

5. Protected Areas: Classification and Management Protocols

India's protected area network is a cornerstone of its conservation strategy, covering over 5% of its geographical area. These areas are declared under the WPA, 1972, and other relevant laws.

  • National Parks:Declared by State or Central Government for the purpose of protecting, propagating, or developing wildlife or its environment. Human activities like grazing, forestry operations, and private ownership are generally prohibited. Boundaries are fixed by law and cannot be altered without legislative assembly resolution. Example: Jim Corbett National Park.
  • Wildlife Sanctuaries:Declared by State Government for the purpose of protecting wildlife or its environment. While offering high protection, certain limited human activities (e.g., regulated grazing, collection of minor forest produce) may be permitted by the Chief Wildlife Warden, provided they do not harm wildlife. Boundaries can be altered by executive order. Example: Bharatpur Bird Sanctuary.
  • Conservation Reserves:Declared by State Government in areas adjacent to National Parks and Sanctuaries, or connecting one protected area with another, where local communities are involved in conservation. These act as buffer zones or corridors.
  • Community Reserves:Declared by State Government in private or community land, where local communities volunteer to conserve wildlife and its habitat. Management is through a Community Reserve Management Committee.
  • Tiger Reserves:Specific National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries designated under Project Tiger for intensive tiger conservation. They follow a core-buffer strategy, with the core being inviolate and the buffer allowing for some regulated human activity.
  • Biosphere Reserves:Designated under UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme, these are large areas of terrestrial and coastal/marine ecosystems promoting solutions to reconcile the conservation of biodiversity with its sustainable use. They have a core zone (strictly protected), a buffer zone (research, education, tourism), and a transition zone (sustainable human settlements and activities). Example: Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve.

Management protocols for protected areas involve scientific research, habitat improvement, anti-poaching measures, eco-development, and community participation. The focus is on maintaining ecological integrity and minimizing human-wildlife conflict.

6. CITES and International Conventions

India is a signatory to several international conventions crucial for global biodiversity conservation and combating illegal wildlife trade. These conventions complement domestic legislation and foster international cooperation.

  • Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES):An international agreement between governments, aiming to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. It classifies species into three Appendices:

* Appendix I: Species threatened with extinction. Trade is generally prohibited, except in exceptional circumstances (e.g., scientific research) and requires permits from both importing and exporting countries.

* Appendix II: Species not necessarily threatened with extinction but for which trade must be controlled to avoid utilization incompatible with their survival. Requires export permits. * Appendix III: Species protected in at least one country, which has asked other CITES Parties for assistance in controlling trade.

Requires a certificate of origin. The Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, has significantly strengthened India's ability to implement CITES provisions domestically.

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD):A landmark international treaty adopted at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Its three main goals are the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources. India is a party and has developed its National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan in line with CBD objectives. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 2022, adopted under the CBD, sets ambitious targets for biodiversity conservation by 2030 and 2050.
  • Ramsar Convention (Convention on Wetlands of International Importance):An intergovernmental treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of wetlands. India has designated numerous Ramsar Sites, recognizing the ecological importance of wetlands for biodiversity, including migratory birds.
  • Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) / Bonn Convention:A global treaty under the aegis of UNEP, aiming to conserve migratory species throughout their range. India is a party and has undertaken initiatives to protect migratory birds and marine species.
  • TRAFFIC Network:A global wildlife trade monitoring network, working in conjunction with CITES and national enforcement agencies like WCCB, to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. It provides research, analysis, and support to combat illegal wildlife trade.

7. Current Challenges in Wildlife Protection

Despite robust legal and institutional frameworks, wildlife protection in India faces significant challenges:

  • Human-Wildlife Conflict:Increasing due to habitat loss, fragmentation, and encroachment into wildlife corridors. This leads to crop damage, livestock depredation, and loss of human lives, often resulting in retaliatory killings of animals. Mitigation strategies include habitat enrichment, early warning systems, compensation schemes, and community engagement.
  • Poaching and Illegal Wildlife Trade:A persistent threat driven by demand for wildlife products (e.g., tiger parts, rhino horn, pangolin scales, exotic birds) in international black markets. Organized crime syndicates are often involved, making enforcement complex. The WCCB and international cooperation are crucial in combating this.
  • Habitat Fragmentation and Loss:Developmental projects (infrastructure, mining, agriculture) lead to the destruction and fragmentation of natural habitats, isolating wildlife populations and making them more vulnerable. This also disrupts wildlife corridors, essential for genetic exchange and species migration .
  • [LINK:/environment/env-03-02-climate-change-impacts|Climate Change Impacts]:Altered weather patterns, extreme events, and rising temperatures affect species distribution, breeding cycles, and food availability. This necessitates adaptive management strategies and consideration of climate change in conservation planning.
  • Invasive Alien Species:Non-native species introduced into an ecosystem can outcompete native species, disrupt ecological balance, and pose a significant threat to biodiversity. The WPA Amendment Act 2022 addresses this by empowering the government to regulate them.

8. Recent Developments

  • Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022:As detailed above, this Act is a major legislative update, primarily aimed at implementing CITES and rationalizing schedules. Its provisions on elephant transfer have generated debate.
  • National Wildlife Action Plan (NWAP) 2017-2031:The third such plan, it adopts a landscape approach to conservation, integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation, promoting eco-tourism, and strengthening research and monitoring. It emphasizes people's participation and addresses human-wildlife conflict.
  • Compensatory Afforestation:The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act (CAMPA Act), 2016, and its rules govern the utilization of funds collected for compensatory afforestation when forest land is diverted for non-forest purposes. While intended to mitigate forest loss, its effectiveness and proper utilization of funds remain a subject of scrutiny. This links to broader environmental laws overview .
  • Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 2022:Adopted under the CBD, it sets ambitious targets for halting and reversing biodiversity loss by 2030, including protecting 30% of land and sea, restoring degraded ecosystems, and reducing species extinction rates. India is a key player in its implementation.

Vyyuha Analysis: The Evolving Paradigm of Wildlife Protection

The evolution of wildlife protection in India, particularly as reflected in the WPA and subsequent policy shifts, showcases a profound transition from a 'species-centric' to an 'ecosystem-centric' approach.

Initially, the focus was predominantly on protecting charismatic megafauna (like tigers and elephants) and preventing their hunting, often in isolated pockets. This 'fortress conservation' model, while effective for specific species, sometimes overlooked the broader ecological health and the rights of local communities.

However, with amendments like the 2002 Act introducing Community and Conservation Reserves, and the emphasis on landscape-level conservation in the NWAP 2017-2031, the paradigm has shifted. The recognition of wildlife corridors, the importance of buffer zones, and the integration of local communities' livelihoods into conservation strategies (e.

g., through eco-development committees) all point towards an ecosystem-centric, inclusive approach. This holistic view acknowledges that species cannot be conserved in isolation; their survival is intrinsically linked to the health and integrity of their entire habitat and the ecological services it provides.

From a UPSC perspective, this critical examination angle is crucial. Questions have indeed shifted from mere factual recall (e.g., 'Which animal is in Schedule I?') to application-based scenarios involving conflict resolution between development and conservation.

Aspirants are expected to analyze the ethical dimensions of conservation, the challenges of balancing tribal rights with wildlife protection, the effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment procedures in safeguarding biodiversity, and the role of international cooperation in addressing transboundary wildlife crime.

Understanding this evolution allows for a more nuanced and analytical answer, moving beyond rote memorization to demonstrate a comprehensive grasp of the subject's complexities.

Vyyuha Connect: Inter-Topic Linkages

Wildlife protection is not an isolated subject but deeply intertwined with various other aspects of governance and society:

  • Tribal Rights & Forest Rights Act :The implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006, granting rights to forest-dwelling communities, often intersects with protected area management. Balancing the rights of indigenous people with conservation imperatives is a significant challenge and a frequent area of UPSC inquiry.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) :Developmental projects near protected areas or critical wildlife habitats require rigorous EIA to assess potential ecological damage and propose mitigation measures. The effectiveness of EIA in safeguarding wildlife is a critical policy debate.
  • Disaster Management :Natural disasters (floods, forest fires, droughts) can severely impact wildlife populations and habitats. Disaster management strategies increasingly incorporate wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and habitat restoration components.
  • International Relations & Biodiversity Diplomacy :India's participation in CITES, CBD, and other conventions reflects its role in global biodiversity governance. Issues like transboundary wildlife crime, climate change impacts on species migration , and sharing of genetic resources involve complex international negotiations and diplomacy.
  • Environmental Acts Overview & [LINK:/environment/env-04-06-national-green-tribunal|National Green Tribunal] :The WPA, 1972, is part of a broader suite of environmental laws. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) often adjudicates cases related to violations of the WPA and other environmental norms, playing a crucial role in environmental justice. Its jurisdiction often overlaps with issues concerning protected areas and wildlife corridors. The enforcement mechanisms of Pollution Control Boards also indirectly contribute to wildlife protection by curbing industrial pollution that could harm habitats.

Often confused with

Side-by-side differences the UPSC paper likes to test.

Wildlife Protection vs Wildlife Sanctuary vs National Park vs Conservation Reserve
Open Wildlife Sanctuary vs National Park vs Conservation Reserve
AspectWildlife ProtectionWildlife Sanctuary vs National Park vs Conservation Reserve
Declaration AuthorityState Government (WPA, 1972)State/Central Government (WPA, 1972)
PurposeProtect specific species or habitatsProtect entire ecosystem (flora, fauna, geomorphology)
BoundariesCan be altered by executive orderFixed by law, cannot be altered without State Legislature resolution
Human ActivitiesLimited human activities (e.g., regulated grazing, minor forest produce collection) may be permitted by CWLWGenerally prohibited (no grazing, forestry, private rights)
Protection LevelHigh protection, but less stringent than National ParkHighest level of protection, inviolate
FocusOften species-specific or habitat-specificHolistic ecosystem protection

While all three categories of protected areas under the WPA, 1972, aim for wildlife conservation, they differ significantly in their legal status, management objectives, and the extent of human activities permitted.

National Parks represent the highest level of protection, with strict prohibitions on human interference and legally fixed boundaries, focusing on holistic ecosystem preservation. Wildlife Sanctuaries offer a slightly more flexible regime, allowing some regulated human activities and having boundaries that can be altered by executive order, often with a focus on specific species or habitats.

Conservation Reserves are a newer category, designed to act as buffer zones or corridors, emphasizing community involvement in conservation efforts in areas adjacent to or connecting larger protected areas.

Understanding these distinctions is crucial for UPSC aspirants, as questions often test the nuances of their management and legal implications.

Why it is tested: Frequently asked in Prelims for factual recall and in Mains for policy implications, management challenges, and the role of community participation in conservation. Essential for understanding India's protected area network.

Wildlife Protection vs CITES Appendix I vs Appendix II vs Appendix III
Open CITES Appendix I vs Appendix II vs Appendix III
AspectWildlife ProtectionCITES Appendix I vs Appendix II vs Appendix III
Threat LevelThreatened with extinctionNot necessarily threatened, but trade must be controlled to avoid threat
Trade RegulationGenerally prohibited for commercial purposesPermitted with appropriate permits/certificates
Permit RequirementRequires both import and export permits (non-commercial only)Requires export permit (or re-export certificate)
Scientific Authority FindingMust find trade will not be detrimental to survivalMust find trade will not be detrimental to survival
ExamplesTiger, Asian Elephant, Gorilla, certain orchidsGreat White Shark, all CITES-listed corals, most rosewood species

CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) uses a system of Appendices to classify species based on their conservation status and the level of trade regulation required.

Appendix I lists species most endangered, where commercial international trade is almost entirely prohibited to prevent their extinction. Appendix II includes species that are not yet critically endangered but could become so without strict trade controls, allowing regulated commercial trade with export permits.

Appendix III contains species protected in at least one country that has sought international cooperation to control trade. The distinctions in threat level and permit requirements are fundamental to CITES's effectiveness in preventing overexploitation through international trade, and India's WPA Amendment Act 2022 now explicitly incorporates these international obligations into domestic law.

Why it is tested: High relevance for Prelims (factual questions on species classification, permit requirements) and Mains (India's international commitments, challenges in combating illegal wildlife trade, biodiversity diplomacy). Essential for understanding global conservation efforts.

Questions students ask

7 answered on this topic.

What are the main provisions of Wildlife Protection Act 1972?

The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, is India's principal legislation for wildlife conservation. Its main provisions include the prohibition of hunting of specified wild animals, protection of certain plant species, and regulation of trade in wildlife products.

It provides for the declaration and management of various types of protected areas such as National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Conservation Reserves, and Community Reserves. The Act also establishes statutory bodies like the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) and the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) to advise on policy and enforce anti-poaching measures.

Penalties for violations are stringent, especially for offenses involving highly endangered species listed in Schedule I. The recent 2022 amendment further streamlined schedules and integrated CITES provisions.

How many schedules are there in Wildlife Protection Act and what do they contain?

Prior to the 2022 amendment, the WPA had six schedules. The Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, rationalized these into four schedules. Schedule I lists species that are critically endangered and receive the highest level of protection, with severe penalties for any violation.

Schedule II includes other protected species, also subject to high protection but with slightly lesser penalties than Schedule I. Schedule III specifies protected plant species, regulating their cultivation, collection, and trade.

Schedule IV lists specimens covered under CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), for which trade is regulated to prevent overexploitation. The earlier Schedule V (vermin) and Schedule VI (specified plants for cultivation) have been removed, with their provisions integrated or superseded.

What is the difference between a national park and a wildlife sanctuary?

Both National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries are protected areas declared under the WPA, 1972, but they differ in their level of protection and permissible activities. A National Park offers a higher degree of protection, with its boundaries fixed by law and generally inviolate.

No human activity, including grazing, forestry, or private ownership, is typically allowed inside a National Park. Wildlife Sanctuaries, while also providing significant protection, are less restrictive.

Their boundaries can be altered by executive order, and certain limited human activities like regulated grazing or collection of minor forest produce may be permitted by the Chief Wildlife Warden, provided they do not harm wildlife.

The primary objective of a National Park is to protect the entire ecosystem, while a Sanctuary often focuses on a specific species or habitat.

Which authority can declare a national park in India?

In India, both the Central Government and the State Governments are empowered to declare a National Park. Under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, a State Government can declare any area, by notification, to be a National Park if it considers that such area, by reason of its ecological, faunal, floral, geomorphological, natural, or zoological significance, is needed to be constituted as a National Park for the purpose of protecting, propagating, or developing wildlife therein or its environment.

The Central Government also has powers to declare National Parks, particularly in areas under its direct administration or in consultation with state governments for specific purposes. Once declared, the boundaries of a National Park can only be altered by a resolution passed by the State Legislature.

What are the penalties for wildlife crimes under the Act?

The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prescribes stringent penalties for wildlife crimes, which vary depending on the schedule under which the animal or plant is listed and the nature of the offense. For offenses involving animals in Schedule I or Part II of Schedule II (which are highly endangered), the minimum punishment is imprisonment for three years, extendable up to seven years, along with a fine of at least ten thousand rupees.

Repeat offenses carry even higher penalties. For other offenses, the punishment is generally imprisonment for up to three years or a fine up to twenty-five thousand rupees, or both. The 2022 amendment has further rationalized and, in some cases, increased fines to act as a stronger deterrent against poaching and illegal trade.

How does CITES convention apply to wildlife trade in India?

India is a signatory to CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), which means it is legally bound to implement its provisions to regulate international trade in endangered wild animals and plants.

The Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, has explicitly incorporated CITES provisions into domestic law. This means that the import, export, transport, or possession of CITES-listed specimens (now primarily covered under Schedule IV of the WPA) is subject to strict regulations, requiring permits and certificates issued by designated Management Authorities.

This domestic legal backing allows India to effectively control and monitor trade, prevent illegal trafficking, and cooperate with other CITES member countries to ensure that international trade does not threaten the survival of species.

What is the role of Wildlife Crime Control Bureau?

The Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) is a statutory body established under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (amended in 2006), to combat organized wildlife crime in India. Its primary roles include collecting and collating intelligence related to wildlife crimes and disseminating it to state and other enforcement agencies.

It also establishes a centralized wildlife crime data bank, coordinates actions with various national and international agencies, and assists foreign authorities in wildlife crime investigations. WCCB advises the Government of India on issues relating to wildlife crimes and suggests measures for their prevention and control.

It plays a critical role in strengthening enforcement and curbing illegal wildlife trade across the country and beyond its borders.