Cross-border Terrorism — Landmark Judgments

Landmark Judgments

Ajmal Kasab vs State of Maharashtra

2012

The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of Ajmal Kasab, the sole surviving terrorist of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, establishing important precedents for trying foreign…

Kartar Singh vs State of Punjab

1994

This landmark judgment upheld the constitutional validity of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), establishing the legal foundation for anti-terrorism…

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State of Maharashtra

2015

The Supreme Court's judgment in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts case established important precedents for conspiracy in terrorist acts and the death penalty in terrorism cases. The…

Also build Paper II skills

Dense constitutional and IR passages mirror CSAT-style comprehension and argument evaluation—build those skills in parallel. CSAT hub.

• Valid & invalid arguments
• Syllogisms
• Critical reasoning