What is the fundamental difference between Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT)?

The fundamental difference lies in the localization of electrons. VBT considers electrons to be localized in specific bonds between two atoms, formed by the overlap of atomic orbitals. It uses concepts like hybridization to explain molecular geometry. In contrast, MOT views electrons as delocalized over the entire molecule, occupying molecular orbitals that are formed by the combination of atomic orbitals from all constituent atoms. These molecular orbitals are polycentric, meaning they encompass multiple nuclei, providing a more global description of electron distribution.

Why is Molecular Orbital Theory considered superior to Valence Bond Theory in some aspects?

MOT is considered superior in certain aspects because it successfully explains phenomena that VBT cannot. For instance, MOT accurately predicts the paramagnetism of the oxygen molecule ($O_2$) due to the presence of unpaired electrons in its antibonding molecular orbitals, which VBT fails to do. It also provides a clear explanation for the existence of species like $H_2^+$ and the non-existence of $He_2$ based on bond order calculations, and inherently accounts for electron delocalization without needing resonance structures.

What are bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals, and how do they differ in energy and stability?

Bonding molecular orbitals (BMOs) are formed by the constructive interference of atomic orbital wave functions, leading to increased electron density between the nuclei. This increased density attracts the nuclei, lowering the energy and stabilizing the molecule. Antibonding molecular orbitals (ABMOs) are formed by the destructive interference of atomic orbital wave functions, resulting in a nodal plane (zero electron density) between the nuclei. This reduces attraction and increases the energy, destabilizing the molecule. BMOs are lower in energy than the original atomic orbitals, while ABMOs are higher in energy.

How do you calculate the bond order using Molecular Orbital Theory, and what does it signify?

Bond order (BO) is calculated as half the difference between the number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals ($N_b$) and the number of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals ($N_a$). The formula is $BO = rac{1}{2}(N_b - N_a)$. A positive bond order indicates a stable molecule, while a bond order of zero suggests the molecule is unstable and unlikely to exist. A higher bond order generally correlates with greater bond strength, shorter bond length, and higher bond dissociation energy.

What is s-p mixing in MOT, and how does it affect the energy level diagram for diatomic molecules?

S-p mixing refers to the interaction and mixing of atomic orbitals of similar energy and appropriate symmetry, specifically the 2s and 2p orbitals, when forming molecular orbitals. This mixing occurs significantly for lighter diatomic molecules (like $B_2, C_2, N_2$) where the energy difference between 2s and 2p AOs is relatively small. This interaction causes a change in the relative energy order of the molecular orbitals: the $sigma 2p_z$ orbital becomes higher in energy than the $pi 2p_x$ and $pi 2p_y$ orbitals. For heavier elements ($O_2, F_2$), the s-p energy gap is larger, and mixing is negligible, so the $sigma 2p_z$ orbital remains lower than the $pi 2p$ orbitals.

Can MOT be applied to polyatomic molecules?

Yes, Molecular Orbital Theory can be extended to polyatomic molecules, though the complexity increases significantly. For polyatomic molecules, molecular orbitals are formed by combining atomic orbitals from all atoms in the molecule, leading to delocalized orbitals spanning the entire structure. Concepts like symmetry adapted linear combinations of atomic orbitals (SALCs) are used to simplify the process. While the fundamental principles remain the same, the construction and visualization of MO diagrams become much more intricate compared to diatomic molecules.

← ALL TOPICS

Chemistry

NEXT TOPIC →

Kossel-Lewis Approach to Chemical Bonding

Molecular Orbital Theory

Chemistry

NEET UG

Version 1Updated 22 Mar 2026

Explore This Topic

Definition Deep Explanation Core Principles NEET Importance Problem Strategy Practice Problems MCQ Practice Quick Revision

Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) is a quantum mechanical model that describes the electronic structure of molecules. Unlike Valence Bond Theory, which focuses on localized bonds between atoms, MOT proposes that electrons in molecules occupy molecular orbitals that are delocalized over the entire molecule. These molecular orbitals are formed by the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) of the …

Quick Summary

Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) describes chemical bonding by forming molecular orbitals (MOs) from the linear combination of atomic orbitals (AOs). Unlike VBT, MOT considers electrons to be delocalized over the entire molecule.

When AOs combine, they form an equal number of MOs: bonding molecular orbitals (BMOs), which are lower in energy and stabilize the molecule, and antibonding molecular orbitals (ABMOs), which are higher in energy and destabilize it.

The combination requires AOs of comparable energy, proper symmetry, and significant overlap. Electrons fill these MOs according to the Aufbau principle, Pauli exclusion principle, and Hund's rule. The 'bond order' is calculated as half the difference between bonding and antibonding electrons ( $BO = \frac{1}{2}(N_b - N_a)$ ), indicating molecular stability and bond strength.

MOT successfully explains magnetic properties (paramagnetism/diamagnetism) and the existence/non-existence of various diatomic species, such as the paramagnetism of $O_2$ and the non-existence of $He_2$ .

The energy order of MOs varies for lighter ( $B_2, C_2, N_2$ ) versus heavier ( $O_2, F_2$ ) diatomic molecules due to s-p mixing.

Vyyuha

Your 6-Month Blueprint, Updated Nightly

AI analyses your progress every night. Wake up to a smarter plan. Every. Single.…

Key Concepts

Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO)

The LCAO principle is the mathematical foundation of MOT. It states that when atomic orbitals (AOs) combine…

Bond Order Calculation and Significance

Bond order (BO) is a quantitative measure derived from MOT that indicates the net number of bonds between two…

Magnetic Properties (Paramagnetism vs. Diamagnetism)

MOT provides a clear explanation for the magnetic behavior of molecules, which VBT often fails to do. A…

LCAO Principle: — MOs formed by

psi_A pm psi_B

Bonding MO ($sigma, pi$): — Lower energy, increased electron density between nuclei, stabilizing.

**Antibonding MO (

sigma^*, pi^*

):** Higher energy, nodal plane between nuclei, destabilizing.

Energy Order (up to $N_2$): —

sigma 1s < sigma^* 1s < sigma 2s < sigma^* 2s < (pi 2p_x = pi 2p_y) < sigma 2p_z < (pi^* 2p_x = pi^* 2p_y) < sigma^* 2p_z

Energy Order ($O_2, F_2$): —

sigma 1s < sigma^* 1s < sigma 2s < sigma^* 2s < sigma 2p_z < (pi 2p_x = pi 2p_y) < (pi^* 2p_x = pi^* 2p_y) < sigma^* 2p_z

Bond Order (BO): —

BO = \frac{1}{2}(N_b - N_a)

Stability: —

BO > 0 Rightarrow

stable;

BO = 0 Rightarrow

unstable. Higher BO

Rightarrow

more stable, shorter bond, higher bond energy.

Magnetic Properties: — Unpaired electrons

Rightarrow

Paramagnetic; All paired electrons

Rightarrow

Diamagnetic.

**MO-Diagram Order (for $le 14$ e-):** 'Sigma Star Sigma Star Pi Pi Sigma Pi Star Pi Star Sigma Star'

**MO-Diagram Order (for $> 14$ e-):** 'Sigma Star Sigma Star Sigma Pi Pi Pi Star Pi Star Sigma Star'

(Remember to insert '1s' and '2s' for the first four, then '2p' for the rest. The key difference is the position of $sigma 2p_z$ relative to $pi 2p$ .)

Bond Order: Bonding - Antibonding / 2 (BO = (Nb - Na)/2)

Magnetic Properties: Unpaired = Paramagnetic; All Paired = Diamagnetic (UAPD)

← ALL TOPICS

Chemistry

NEXT TOPIC →

Kossel-Lewis Approach to Chemical Bonding