Carbon Sequestration
India's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, submitted to the UNFCCC, states: 'To create an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030.' This commitment underscores the nation's strategic reliance on nature-based solutions, particularly afforestation and reforestation, as a cornerstone of its c…
Quick Summary
Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to mitigate climate change. It is broadly categorized into natural (biological) and artificial (geological/technological) methods.
Natural sequestration leverages ecosystems like forests, soils, mangroves, and seagrass beds to absorb CO2 through photosynthesis and store it in biomass and sediments. India's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement commit to creating an additional carbon sink of 2.
5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through increased forest and tree cover by 2030, highlighting the nation's reliance on these nature-based solutions. Key Indian policies like the National Mission for a Green India (GIM) and the MISHTI scheme for mangrove restoration are central to this effort.
Artificial sequestration involves technologies like Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), where CO2 from industrial sources or directly from the air is captured and injected into deep geological formations.
While more expensive, CCS is crucial for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors. Challenges include ensuring permanence of storage, high costs, scalability, and social acceptance. Recent developments, such as India's Green Credit Program and global recognition of CCUS at COP28, underscore the evolving landscape of carbon sequestration as an indispensable tool for achieving net-zero emissions and fostering sustainable development.
Understanding these methods, India's policy framework, and associated challenges is vital for UPSC aspirants.
Full explanation
Carbon sequestration is a cornerstone strategy in the global effort to combat climate change, focusing on the capture and long-term storage of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). This process is vital for reducing the concentration of greenhouse gases, thereby mitigating global warming.
From a UPSC perspective, the critical examination angle here is not just the 'what' but the 'how' and 'why' – how different methods function, why they are chosen, and what their implications are for India's climate strategy and sustainable development goals .
Origin and Evolution of the Concept
While natural carbon cycling has occurred for millennia, the concept of 'carbon sequestration' as a deliberate climate mitigation strategy gained prominence with the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change in the late 20th century.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, starting from the 1990s, systematically highlighted the role of CO2 in global warming and the need for both emission reduction and carbon removal.
Early discussions focused on afforestation and reforestation, but as industrial emissions grew, technological solutions like Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) began to be explored. The Kyoto Protocol (1997) was one of the first international agreements to recognize land-use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) activities as eligible for carbon credits, thereby formalizing the role of biological sequestration in climate policy.
The Paris Agreement (2015) further solidified the importance of carbon sinks, with countries including specific targets for enhancing forest and tree cover in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) .
Constitutional and Legal Basis in India
India does not have a single, overarching constitutional article explicitly mandating carbon sequestration. However, the principles underpinning it are deeply embedded in environmental protection laws and policies.
Article 48A of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) mandates the State to 'endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wildlife of the country.' Article 51A(g) imposes a fundamental duty on every citizen 'to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures.
' These articles provide the constitutional bedrock for policies promoting forest and tree cover, which are primary natural carbon sinks.
Key legislative frameworks include:
- Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA): — This act regulates the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes, aiming to conserve existing forests. Amendments, such as the Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act, 2023, aim to streamline approvals while also promoting afforestation on non-forest lands and compensatory afforestation, indirectly enhancing carbon sinks .
- Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: — Protects biodiversity, which is intrinsically linked to healthy ecosystems capable of robust carbon sequestration.
- Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: — A comprehensive umbrella legislation empowering the central government to take measures for environmental protection and improvement.
- Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2011 (and subsequent amendments): — Regulates activities in coastal areas, indirectly protecting blue carbon ecosystems like mangroves and seagrass beds .
Types and Mechanisms of Carbon Sequestration
- Biological Sequestration (Nature-Based Solutions):
* Forests and Terrestrial Ecosystems (Green Carbon): Plants absorb CO2 through photosynthesis, converting it into biomass (wood, leaves, roots) and releasing oxygen. This carbon is stored in living trees, dead organic matter, and soil.
Mature forests can store vast amounts of carbon. India's forest and tree cover increased by 2,261 sq km between 2019 and 2021, with total forest and tree cover now at 80.9 million hectares (FSI, India State of Forest Report 2021).
The total carbon stock in India's forests is estimated to be 7,204 million tonnes (FSI, 2021), an increase of 79.4 million tonnes since 2019. This highlights the immense potential of forest carbon sequestration.
* Mechanisms: Afforestation (planting trees on non-forested land), Reforestation (replanting trees on deforested land), Agroforestry (integrating trees into agricultural landscapes), Sustainable Forest Management (SFM).
* Example: The 'Green India Mission' (GIM), part of India's National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), aims to increase forest/tree cover and improve the quality of forest ecosystems, thereby enhancing carbon sinks.
A specific project under GIM in the Aravalli hills (Haryana) involves planting native species to restore degraded land, enhancing local carbon sequestration capacity and biodiversity (MoEFCC, 2023). * Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) Enhancement: Agricultural soils can store significant amounts of carbon.
Practices that increase soil organic matter (SOM) directly lead to higher SOC. * Mechanisms: No-till farming, cover cropping, crop rotation, use of organic fertilizers, biochar application, improved pasture management.
These practices enhance soil health, water retention, and nutrient cycling. * Example: The 'National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture' (NMSA), another component of NAPCC, promotes climate-resilient agricultural practices, including those that enhance SOC.
Projects in states like Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh are demonstrating increased SOC levels through integrated nutrient management and conservation agriculture (Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, 2023).
* Blue Carbon Ecosystems: Coastal and marine ecosystems like mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass beds are exceptionally efficient at sequestering and storing carbon, often at rates significantly higher than terrestrial forests.
This carbon, stored in the plants and sediments, is known as 'blue carbon'. * Mechanisms: High productivity, anaerobic conditions in sediments slowing decomposition, long-term burial of organic matter.
* Example: The 'Mangrove Initiative for Shoreline Habitats & Tangible Incomes' (MISHTI) scheme, announced in India's Union Budget 2023-24, aims to restore and protect mangroves along India's coastline.
The Sundarbans in West Bengal, home to the world's largest mangrove forest, is a prime example of a blue carbon sink, storing an estimated 2.23 million tonnes of organic carbon in its soil (IUCN, 2020).
Mangrove restoration projects in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh are actively enhancing these critical carbon sinks (MoEFCC, 2024).
- Geological Sequestration: — Involves injecting captured CO2 deep underground into porous rock formations.
* Mechanisms: CO2 is captured from large point sources (e.g., power plants, industrial facilities) and compressed, then transported and injected into geological formations such as depleted oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, or deep saline aquifers.
The CO2 is trapped by impermeable caprock. * Example: While large-scale commercial geological CCS projects are limited in India, pilot projects are underway. For instance, the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has explored enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using CO2 injection in some of its fields, which can also serve as a form of geological sequestration (ONGC Annual Report, 2023).
- Technological Sequestration (Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage - CCUS/CCS):
* Post-combustion Capture: CO2 is separated from flue gases after fossil fuel combustion. * Pre-combustion Capture: Fuel is processed before combustion to produce a syngas, from which CO2 is separated.
* Oxy-fuel Combustion: Fuel is burned in pure oxygen, producing a flue gas highly concentrated in CO2. * Direct Air Capture (DAC): Technologies that capture CO2 directly from the ambient air, rather than from a point source.
This is crucial for addressing diffuse emissions and historical CO2. * Utilization: Captured CO2 can be used in various applications, such as enhanced oil recovery, production of chemicals, building materials, or synthetic fuels.
This is the 'U' in CCUS. * Example: Tata Steel has commissioned India's first carbon capture plant at its Jamshedpur works in 2021, capable of capturing 5 tonnes of CO2 per day from blast furnace gas, which is then reused on-site.
This demonstrates early-stage industrial application of CCS in India (Tata Steel, 2021).
Global Initiatives and India's Commitments
- IPCC: — Provides scientific assessments on climate change, including the role and potential of carbon sequestration technologies and nature-based solutions. Its reports guide global policy.
- UNFCCC & Paris Agreement: — The overarching international framework. India's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement commit to creating an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030 (India's Updated First NDC, UNFCCC, 2022). This is a significant commitment to biological sequestration.
- COP Outcomes: — Recent COPs (e.g., COP28 in Dubai, 2023) have emphasized the need for all pathways to net-zero, including carbon capture, utilization, and storage, alongside rapid and deep emission cuts. They also highlight the importance of nature-based solutions and the protection of critical ecosystems like mangroves.
India's Policy Frameworks and Potential
India's approach to carbon sequestration is multi-pronged, integrating it into broader climate and environmental policies:
- National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC): — Launched in 2008, NAPCC outlines eight national missions. Several missions directly or indirectly promote carbon sequestration:
* National Mission for a Green India (GIM): Aims to protect, restore, and enhance India's forest cover and respond to climate change by a combination of adaptation and mitigation measures. It targets increasing forest/tree cover by 5 million hectares and improving the quality of forest cover on another 5 million hectares, enhancing carbon sequestration by 50-60 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent by 2020 (though this target is under review for 2030).
* National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA): Promotes climate-resilient agricultural practices, including those that enhance soil organic carbon. * National Water Mission: Focuses on water conservation, which is crucial for healthy ecosystems that sequester carbon.
- India's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) (Updated 2022): — Beyond the carbon sink target, India also committed to reducing the emissions intensity of its GDP by 45% by 2030 from 2005 levels and achieving about 50% cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based energy resources by 2030. While these primarily focus on emission reduction and renewable energy , the carbon sink target is a direct sequestration commitment.
- Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (and 2023 Amendment): — As discussed, this act is fundamental to protecting existing forest sinks and promoting compensatory afforestation. The 2023 amendment seeks to clarify the applicability of the Act to various lands, potentially impacting the scope of afforestation efforts.
- Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA): — Established under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016, CAMPA manages funds for compensatory afforestation, wildlife management, and other forest-related activities, directly contributing to carbon sink enhancement.
- National Coastal Mission (NCM): — Focuses on integrated coastal zone management, including the conservation and restoration of blue carbon ecosystems like mangroves and coral reefs.
Challenges in Carbon Sequestration
- Permanence: — Ensuring that sequestered carbon remains stored for the long term. Biological sinks are vulnerable to disturbances (forest fires, disease, land-use change). Geological storage faces risks of leakage.
- Cost: — Technological solutions like CCS and DAC are currently expensive. The cost of capturing and storing CO2 can range from 100+ per tonne of CO2 (IEA, 2023). Nature-based solutions are generally more cost-effective but require significant land area and long-term management.
- Scalability: — Implementing sequestration projects at the scale required to make a significant impact on global CO2 levels is a monumental challenge, requiring vast land resources for biological methods and massive infrastructure for technological ones.
- Public Acceptance and Social Equity: — Land acquisition for large-scale afforestation or CCS projects can lead to conflicts with local communities, impacting livelihoods and traditional rights.
- Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV): — Accurately measuring and verifying the amount of carbon sequestered, especially in biological systems, can be complex and costly.
- Energy Penalty: — CCS technologies require significant energy to operate, potentially increasing the overall energy demand of industrial facilities.
Recent Developments (2023-2024)
- COP28 Outcomes (December 2023): — The 'UAE Consensus' explicitly recognized the role of transitional fuels and technologies like CCS in achieving net-zero, alongside a call for accelerating emission reductions. It also underscored the importance of protecting and restoring nature, including forests and mangroves, for their climate benefits.
- India's Green Credit Program (GCP) (October 2023): — Launched by the MoEFCC, GCP incentivizes environmental actions, including afforestation and water conservation, by allowing individuals and entities to generate 'Green Credits' that can be traded. This market-based mechanism aims to encourage private sector participation in environmental conservation and carbon sink enhancement.
- Focus on Blue Carbon: — India's MISHTI scheme (Union Budget 2023-24) signifies a growing recognition of the immense potential of blue carbon ecosystems. The Ministry of Earth Sciences is also undertaking extensive mapping and assessment of India's blue carbon potential.
- Carbon Market Developments: — India is developing its domestic carbon market under the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022, which will facilitate carbon credit trading, potentially incentivizing sequestration projects. (Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 2024).
Vyyuha Analysis: Carbon Sequestration as India's Climate Diplomacy Tool
From a strategic perspective, India's robust commitment to carbon sequestration, particularly through nature-based solutions, serves as a powerful tool in its climate diplomacy. By pledging to create a significant carbon sink of 2.
5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent by 2030, India demonstrates proactive engagement with global climate goals, positioning itself not merely as a developing nation seeking common but differentiated responsibilities, but as a responsible global actor contributing substantially to mitigation efforts.
This commitment enhances India's credibility in international forums like the UNFCCC and G20, allowing it to advocate for equitable climate finance and technology transfer. The emphasis on forest and tree cover also aligns with global biodiversity conservation agendas, providing co-benefits that resonate with a broader international audience.
Furthermore, the development of a domestic carbon market and initiatives like the Green Credit Program signal India's intent to leverage market mechanisms, potentially attracting foreign investment in green projects and carbon credit generation.
This approach allows India to balance its developmental imperatives with its environmental responsibilities, showcasing a model of sustainable growth that integrates natural capital. For aspirants, the key insight is to recognize how domestic environmental policies, when strategically framed, can become potent instruments of foreign policy and economic leverage in the global climate discourse.
Inter-Topic Connections
Carbon sequestration is deeply intertwined with various other environmental and economic topics crucial for UPSC. It is a direct component of [LINK:/environment/env-03-04-climate-change-mitigation|Climate Change Mitigation] strategies.
Its success depends heavily on Forest Conservation and Coastal Zone Management . The development of CCS/CCUS technologies connects to Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy as energy demand for these processes needs to be met sustainably.
Policy frameworks are part of broader Environmental Governance and International Climate Agreements . Ultimately, enhancing carbon sinks contributes to Biodiversity Conservation by protecting and restoring ecosystems.
Vyyuha's analysis suggests that a holistic understanding of these interconnections is vital for comprehensive answer writing in Mains examinations.
Often confused with
Side-by-side differences the UPSC paper likes to test.
| Aspect | Carbon Sequestration | Artificial Carbon Sequestration Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Leverages natural biological and geological processes (photosynthesis, soil carbon cycling, ocean absorption). | Human-engineered processes to capture CO2 from point sources or ambient air, then store or utilize it. |
| Typical Capacity (tCO2/ha or facility) | Highly variable: Forests (2-10 tCO2/ha/yr), Mangroves (5-10 tCO2/ha/yr in biomass, vast in sediments), Soil (0.1-1 tCO2/ha/yr increase). | Industrial CCS (0.1-10+ million tCO2/year per facility), DAC (thousands to millions tCO2/year per facility). |
| Cost (ballpark $/tCO2) | Generally lower: $10-$50/tCO2 (afforestation, soil carbon). | Generally higher: $30-$100+/tCO2 (CCS), $200-$1000+/tCO2 (DAC). |
| Permanence (years/centuries) | Variable: Decades to centuries (forests, vulnerable to disturbance), millennia (blue carbon sediments, stable soil carbon). | Centuries to millennia (geological storage, if secure), but requires robust monitoring. |
| Scalability | High, but constrained by land availability, ecological limits, and long growth cycles. | High, but constrained by capital investment, energy demand, infrastructure, and geological storage capacity. |
| Typical Risks | Reversal due to deforestation, fires, disease; land-use conflicts; biodiversity impacts if monocultures. | Leakage from storage sites; high energy penalty; public opposition; high upfront investment; unknown long-term impacts. |
| Co-benefits | Biodiversity conservation, soil health, water regulation, livelihood support, climate resilience. | Decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors, potential for CO2 utilization in new products. |
Natural carbon sequestration methods, such as afforestation, soil carbon enhancement, and blue carbon initiatives, leverage ecological processes, offering cost-effective solutions with significant co-benefits like biodiversity and livelihood support.
However, their permanence can be vulnerable to natural disturbances and land-use changes. Artificial methods, including Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Direct Air Capture (DAC), are engineered solutions that offer high capacity for point-source emissions or atmospheric CO2 removal but come with higher costs, energy demands, and infrastructure requirements.
Both approaches are crucial for comprehensive climate change mitigation, with natural methods often preferred for their holistic benefits and technological methods for addressing specific industrial emissions and legacy CO2.
Why it is tested: Aspirants must understand the distinct advantages, limitations, and policy implications of both natural and artificial methods. This comparison is vital for evaluating India's climate strategy, which balances both approaches, and for formulating balanced arguments in Mains answers regarding the feasibility and sustainability of different sequestration pathways.
| Aspect | Carbon Sequestration | Afforestation vs Reforestation |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Planting trees on lands that have not been forested for a long period (e.g., 50 years or more), or historically never forested. | Replanting trees on lands that were previously forested but have been cleared (e.g., due to logging, fires, or agriculture). |
| Baseline Condition | Non-forest land (e.g., barren land, agricultural land converted to forest). | Degraded forest land or recently deforested land. |
| Carbon Sink Impact | Creates new carbon sinks, adding to the total global forest carbon stock. | Restores existing carbon sinks, recovering lost carbon stock and enhancing ecosystem resilience. |
| Ecological Restoration | Can establish new ecosystems, potentially introducing new species or altering existing landscapes. | Aims to restore the original forest ecosystem, often using native species and promoting natural regeneration. |
| Policy Context | Often part of large-scale greening initiatives, land reclamation, or compensatory afforestation on non-forest land. | Integral to sustainable forest management, post-logging recovery, and ecological restoration projects. |
| Challenges | Higher initial establishment costs, slower soil development, potential for monocultures if not carefully planned, land availability. | Requires careful site preparation, managing invasive species, ensuring genetic diversity, often easier due to existing soil structure. |
Afforestation involves establishing forests on historically non-forested land, thereby creating new carbon sinks and adding to the global forest cover. Reforestation, conversely, focuses on replanting trees on land that was previously forested but has been cleared, aiming to restore degraded forest ecosystems and recover lost carbon stocks.
Both are crucial for biological carbon sequestration and are integral to India's NDC commitments, but they differ in their baseline land conditions, ecological goals, and implementation challenges. Understanding this distinction is key for evaluating the effectiveness and appropriateness of various forest-based climate mitigation strategies.
Why it is tested: This distinction is critical for precise terminology in Mains answers and for analyzing government schemes like the Green India Mission. Aspirants should be able to differentiate between these concepts and discuss their respective roles in enhancing India's carbon sink potential and achieving its climate targets.
Questions students ask
9 answered on this topic.
What is carbon sequestration?
Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to reduce its concentration in the atmosphere. This helps mitigate global warming and climate change. It involves both natural processes, like photosynthesis by plants and absorption by oceans, and artificial methods, such as capturing CO2 from industrial emissions and injecting it deep underground.
The goal is to prevent CO2 from re-entering the atmosphere for extended periods, contributing to long-term climate stability.
How does afforestation contribute to carbon sequestration?
Afforestation, the planting of trees on land that has not been forested for a long time, directly contributes to carbon sequestration by increasing the Earth's natural carbon sinks. As trees grow, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, converting it into biomass (wood, leaves, roots) and storing it.
This carbon remains locked in the trees and the soil as long as the forest stands. Large-scale afforestation projects significantly enhance the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to remove and store atmospheric carbon, playing a vital role in climate change mitigation.
What are blue carbon ecosystems?
Blue carbon ecosystems are coastal and marine habitats, primarily mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass beds, that are exceptionally efficient at capturing and storing carbon from the atmosphere and oceans.
They sequester carbon in their biomass and, more significantly, in their underlying sediments, often at rates much higher than terrestrial forests. The anaerobic conditions in these waterlogged soils slow down decomposition, allowing carbon to be stored for millennia.
These ecosystems also provide critical co-benefits such as coastal protection, biodiversity habitat, and support for fisheries.
What is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)?
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a technological process that involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from large point sources, such as power plants and industrial facilities, before they are released into the atmosphere.
The captured CO2 is then compressed, transported, and injected deep underground into suitable geological formations (e.g., depleted oil/gas reservoirs or saline aquifers) for long-term storage. CCS is considered a crucial technology for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors and achieving net-zero emission targets, though it faces challenges related to cost, energy consumption, and storage permanence.
How is India addressing carbon sequestration in its climate policy?
India is addressing carbon sequestration primarily through its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement, committing to create an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030.
Key policy frameworks include the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), particularly the National Mission for a Green India (GIM) and the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA).
Recent initiatives like the MISHTI scheme for mangrove restoration and the Green Credit Program further bolster India's efforts in enhancing both green and blue carbon sinks.
What are the challenges in implementing carbon sequestration projects?
Implementing carbon sequestration projects faces several challenges. For biological methods, key issues include ensuring permanence (vulnerability to fires, deforestation), land availability, and social equity concerns related to land acquisition.
For technological methods like CCS, challenges include high capital and operational costs, significant energy requirements ('energy penalty'), the need for extensive infrastructure, and public perception regarding safety and long-term storage integrity.
Accurate monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of sequestered carbon also remain complex and costly across all methods.
What is the role of soil organic carbon in climate mitigation?
Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a vital role in climate mitigation by storing large quantities of carbon in agricultural and forest soils. Healthy soils, rich in organic matter, can sequester significant amounts of atmospheric CO2.
Practices like no-till farming, cover cropping, agroforestry, and the use of organic amendments enhance soil organic matter, thereby increasing SOC levels. This not only removes CO2 from the atmosphere but also improves soil fertility, water retention, and overall ecosystem health, contributing to sustainable agriculture and climate resilience.
What is the difference between carbon capture and carbon removal?
Carbon capture typically refers to technologies that prevent CO2 from entering the atmosphere by capturing it at the source (e.g., power plants) or directly from the air (Direct Air Capture). Carbon removal is a broader term encompassing all activities that remove CO2 from the atmosphere and durably store it.
While carbon capture is a component of carbon removal, the latter also includes nature-based solutions like afforestation and soil carbon enhancement. The key distinction lies in the source: capture often targets point-source emissions, while removal aims at atmospheric CO2 regardless of its origin.
How does biochar contribute to soil carbon sequestration?
Biochar is a charcoal-like material produced from biomass pyrolysis (heating in the absence of oxygen). When added to soil, it significantly enhances carbon sequestration because it is highly stable and resistant to decomposition, allowing carbon to remain stored for hundreds to thousands of years.
Beyond carbon storage, biochar improves soil fertility, water retention, and nutrient availability, making it a promising tool for sustainable agriculture and climate mitigation. It transforms unstable organic carbon into a more stable form, preventing its rapid return to the atmosphere.
Revise in 30 seconds
Key Facts & Vyyuha Quick Recall:
- Definition: — Capturing & storing atmospheric CO2.
- Types: — Biological (Nature-based), Geological, Technological.
- India's NDC Target: — Add. carbon sink of 2.5-3 billion tonnes CO2e by 2030 (forest/tree cover).
- FSI 2021: — Total forest & tree cover 80.9 million ha; Carbon stock 7,204 million tonnes.
- Blue Carbon: — Mangroves, salt marshes, seagrass (high efficiency).
- Green Carbon: — Forests, soils.
- Key Schemes: — GIM, MISHTI, NMSA.
- Key Acts: — Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980/2023; Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022.
- Vyyuha Quick Recall (FOREST):
* F - Forests & Afforestation * O - Ocean & Blue Carbon * R - Reforestation & Restoration * E - Enhanced Soil Carbon * S - Sustainable Agriculture * T - Technological Solutions (CCS/DAC)
Vyyuha Quick Recall: FOREST
- F — Forests & Afforestation (Green Carbon, GIM, FSI data)
- O — Ocean & Blue Carbon (Mangroves, Seagrass, MISHTI Scheme)
- R — Reforestation & Restoration (Replanting degraded forest land)
- E — Enhanced Soil Carbon (No-till, Cover Cropping, NMSA)
- S — Sustainable Agriculture (Agroforestry, Biochar, Soil health)
- T — Technological Solutions (CCS, DAC, Industrial Capture)