Internal Security·Legal Reforms
Peace Processes — Legal Reforms
Constitution VerifiedUPSC Verified
Version 1Updated 7 Mar 2026
| Entry | Year | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18th Amendment to the Sixth Schedule | 2003 | This amendment was part of the Bodo Accord (2003) and led to the creation of the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) by amending the Sixth Schedule. It provided for a larger autonomous administrative unit with more powers than a typical District Council. | Significantly enhanced the autonomy of Bodo-dominated areas in Assam, leading to the establishment of the BTC (later BTR). It demonstrated the flexibility of the Sixth Schedule to accommodate specific regional aspirations and resolve ethnic conflicts through greater self-governance. |
| 27th Amendment Act | 1971 | This amendment inserted Articles 371C, 371D, 371E, 371F, 371G, and 371H into the Constitution, providing special provisions for various states, including Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh. | Crucial for granting special status to several Northeastern states, including Mizoram (Article 371G) and Arunachal Pradesh (Article 371H), which became relevant for their respective peace processes and administrative arrangements. It allowed for specific safeguards and administrative mechanisms tailored to their unique socio-political contexts. |
| 37th Amendment Act | 1975 | This amendment provided for a Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers for Arunachal Pradesh, which was then a Union Territory. | While not directly a peace accord, it laid the constitutional groundwork for the political evolution of Arunachal Pradesh, which has its own history of ethnic dynamics and border issues, indirectly contributing to the broader framework of governance in the Northeast. |